[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
I think they existed.
I think they were pretty-much as their skeletons have been rebuilt.
The skeletons 'appear" to be real and to have been discovered.
Keeping in mind, of course, that 'scientists' thought
-until "yesterday" -
that the Rocky Mountains were "new" and the Appalachians were "old"
and now (currently) "they" think the opposite.

Not to mention their constantly-changing ?thoughts ? on man and how
long we have been here... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

AND.. of course... if "evolution" is correct ... and "creationism"
is incorrect ...
WHERE is the "missing link" to support this "theory"? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
??? - What ? ... I'm jus' sayin'... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Ya know... If they REALLY wanna get and hold MY interest - 'they' will... :
A - Find DRAGON skeletons !
B - Find the proof that ARTHUR - and therefore MERLIN -are/were actual
PEOPLE and they did live/exist.
Now... THAT ! would interest me! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Why? What do you think? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


EDIT:
PLUS... 'they' demoted/reclassified PLUTO ?!?
WTF ? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Last edited by Ja'aj on Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:53 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Pluto)

Of course dinosaurs existed. We have their bones as solid evidence. They didn't come from a prehistoric, 40 foot long cow. Plus we have their descendants, such as Newt Gingrich and Donald Trump, as further evidence.
How else do you explain them?

there are so many skeletons unearthed world wide,how could any body doubt it ? we do have proof of that at least.here is more proof
scientists keep changing their minds about a lot of their theories ,so in some ways scientific theories are no more accurate than clairvoyance.
but bones and other solid things speak for themselves.

Tater Salad wrote:Of course dinosaurs existed. We have their bones as solid evidence. They didn't come from a prehistoric, 40 foot long cow. Plus we have their descendants, such as Newt Gingrich and Donald Trump, as further evidence.
How else do you explain them?

Tater, trying to visualise a prehistoroc 40 foot long cow ! perhaps you could draw a picture of one ?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Why a "cow" ?

Ja'aj wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Why a "cow" ?

Jaáj,to me there is something about cows that just invite whimsical comments and humour, don't even ask !
I wonder what was in Taters mind when he had that wonderful vision of a prehistoric 40 foot cow, or was that a forty footed cow ??

I sometimes wonder if scientists and others always get it right... like for sure. The bones, the order of placing, the skin, the texture, etc... After all, nobody has one picture to go by and things do get changed after more thought and information.
So, just wondering how others see it.

ok they got the skeleton ,it's a jigsaw puzzle and it all fits,but as you said ,the rest of it has no proof,I guess that's the fun part, clothing it.

Good question. I imagine 'training', and 'time-reference'
makes them 'close'.
Of course, if there really are 'eggs' preserved... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

... Um ...
Let's not begin a repopulation
with the T-Rex, okay?

"Plus we have their descendants, such as Newt Gingrich and Donald Trump, as further evidence.
How else do you explain them?"

AAA-HA! That explains a lot! Thanks, Tater. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Newt and Trump are NOT herbaceous ...?... Herbivorous ...?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
In any case evolution was NOT kind if those 'people' are the end-result.